Why it works
Structured protocols for looking at student work, teams examining actual student responses together using a clear process, help teachers see what students genuinely understand, uncover misconceptions, calibrate expectations, and decide what to teach next. Research on this practice links it to improved instruction and teacher learning. The protocol matters: it keeps the conversation focused on the work and evidence rather than defensive or vague.
The research: Research on looking at student work; protocols from the School Reform Initiative.
The run-of-show
Choose your slot. The agenda, timings, and length update to match.
The core activity: analyze student work with a protocol
Teams leave with insights from the work and a next instructional step.
- Bring a set of real student work to a common task.
- Use a simple protocol to look closely together: describe, then interpret, then decide.
- Surface what students understand and the misconceptions.
- Decide what to teach next based on the evidence.
Facilitator notes
- Use a structured protocol; describe before interpreting.
- Focus on evidence, and decide next steps.
- Keep it non-defensive.
Adapt it
- <b>Elementary and secondary:</b> the same protocol approach.
- <b>Teams:</b> bring common-task work.
- <b>All settings:</b> describe, interpret, decide.
Participant handout
One page for every teacher. Print it, or save it as a PDF.
Analyzing Student Work: look, then decide
<b>Evidence over scores:</b> a protocol to describe, interpret, and decide what to teach next from real work.
- The common task and student work:
- The protocol we use:
- What students understand and the misconceptions:
- What we will teach next:
- How we keep it evidence-focused:
Make it stick
Work drives instruction:
- Analyze work with a protocol.
- Let it drive instruction.
- Bring a next step from student work to the team.