Why it works
Research finds instructional coaching is among the more effective forms of professional development when it is sustained and job-embedded: a cycle sets a specific goal, gathers evidence from real teaching, gives focused feedback, and plans a concrete next step, repeated over time. Trust and a non-evaluative stance are what make teachers open to the feedback.
The research: Research on instructional coaching (Kraft and colleagues); Knight on coaching.
The run-of-show
Choose your slot. The agenda, timings, and length update to match.
The core activity: plan a coaching cycle
Coaches leave with a full cycle planned around a teacher-owned goal.
- Choose a specific, teacher-owned goal.
- Plan what evidence you will gather by observing real teaching.
- Plan focused feedback tied to the goal, and how you keep it non-evaluative.
- Plan the concrete next step and when you will cycle back.
Facilitator notes
- Keep goals teacher-owned and specific.
- Observe real practice.
- Keep it non-evaluative, and cycle over time, not once.
Adapt it
- <b>Elementary and secondary:</b> the same cycle.
- <b>New teachers:</b> shorter, more frequent cycles.
- <b>All settings:</b> teacher-owned goals.
Participant handout
One page for every teacher. Print it, or save it as a PDF.
Coaching Cycles: goal, observe, feedback, next step
<b>Sustained and non-evaluative:</b> a teacher-owned goal, real evidence, focused feedback, a next step.
- The specific, teacher-owned goal:
- The evidence I will gather:
- My focused, non-evaluative feedback:
- The concrete next step:
- When I will cycle back:
Make it stick
Cycle and protect trust:
- Keep cycles going over time.
- Protect the non-evaluative relationship.
- Bring a coaching cycle that moved practice to the leadership team.
Common questions
How is coaching different from evaluation?
What does a coaching cycle look like?
How long should a cycle take?
Go deeper
- Jim Knight on instructional coaching