Why it works
Schools adopt far more technology than improves outcomes, and many tools add workload, distraction, and privacy risk without a clear learning benefit. A simple vetting habit, start from the learning goal, ask what problem the tool solves, weigh time and privacy cost, and look for evidence, prevents tool overload and protects student data.
The research: Research on edtech effectiveness; FERPA and COPPA privacy requirements.
The run-of-show
Choose your slot. The agenda, timings, and length update to match.
The core activity: vet one tool
Teachers leave having vetted one tool against learning value, privacy, and cost.
- Pick a tool you use or are considering.
- Name the specific learning problem it solves, and whether a simpler approach would do.
- Weigh the time and privacy cost: what data, where it goes, FERPA and COPPA.
- Decide: adopt, drop, or simplify.
Facilitator notes
- Start from the learning goal.
- Ask the privacy questions, and weigh the time cost.
- Prefer fewer, better tools.
Adapt it
- <b>Elementary:</b> simple, privacy-safe tools; fewer is better.
- <b>Secondary:</b> tools matched to real tasks.
- <b>Leaders:</b> vet and approve tools at scale, and protect data.
Participant handout
One page for every teacher. Print it, or save it as a PDF.
Vetting EdTech: learning, privacy, evidence
<b>Choose on purpose:</b> what problem it solves, the time and privacy cost, and whether evidence backs it.
- The tool:
- The specific learning problem it solves:
- Whether a simpler approach would do:
- The time and privacy cost (data, FERPA/COPPA):
- My decision (adopt, drop, simplify):
Make it stick
Fewer, better tools:
- Vet before adopting.
- Prefer fewer, well-chosen tools.
- Bring a tool you dropped, or kept, to PLC or leadership.